rgroff2013 on Critical Social Ontology Works… Dan Morrison on Critical Social Ontology Works… rgroff2013 on On David Armstrong Joshua on On David Armstrong rgroff2013 on Emergence, Part 2 (of 3)
- About powers
- Contemporary analytic metaphysics
- Free Will
- Give us a little blurb abt yourself
- Good books!
- History of philosophy
- How to post things to the blog!
- Metaphysics & social theory
- Powers and agency
- Publicize your work
- Questions, thoughts, etc.
Category Archives: Contemporary analytic metaphysics
Some preliminary thoughts about substances and metaphysical necessitation, by way of Harre & Madden. Okay, the following is a view (as they say): “The relationship between causes and the effects that they bring about is one of metaphysical necessity, not … Continue reading →
… : A Reply to Alexander Bird.” Here, in talk form, is an overdue reply to my friend Alexander. Presented by Skype to a conference on powers and essentialism organized by the philosophy department of American University in Beirut this … Continue reading →
Hi all, Sorry for the hiatus. I’ll try to think of some good ways to jump start conversation, but for now – though this might do it – here is an outline of a talk I’m set to give next … Continue reading →
Contemporary debates over categorical properties – mention of such properties, even – very often involves people talking past one another. This did not used to be the case. It used to be that everyone knew what a categorical property was … Continue reading →
Walter Ott is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Virginia. He is the author of Causation & Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy (Oxford, 2009) [which I liked a lot], among other things. I’m completely on board … Continue reading →
This: In the 17th c., there was a lively argument about whether or not God created the world such that material objects have their own causal oomph. To use the technical term. Some said yes. Some said no. On the … Continue reading →
http://understandingsociety.blogspot.com/2014/03/causal-necessity.html Dan writes: “My issue with their argument is that I don’t think that logical sufficiency captures what causal theorists have in mind when they assert that the cause brings about its effect with some degree of necessity.” He concludes: … Continue reading →